Morning,
My first attempt to blog via e-mail. Let's see how this goes.
Spent some time over the past week watching baseball games.
Nice to be outdoors instead of indoors, especially since we have a bit of nice weather here.
There's likely a long and documented list comparing and contrasting the two sports (hockey v baseball).
I found it very interesting. (Very different yet somewhat the same...)
Couple quick points.
A. It's all about the FUNDAMENTALS!
Baseball - catching, throwing, running, hitting.
Yes, there's strategy involved (we can get into that later),
but if you can't do the fundamentals, it doeesn't matter so much.
Watching a ball get hit, and not caught would lead you to the foundation of fundamentals.
In hockey, the same issue of fundamentals applies with skating, passing, shooting.
Watching hockey with players who can't pass may be the equivalent to baseball players who can't catch.
B. Player rotation.
This isn't pro ball. These players are continuing to develop. Putting them into different positions,
and making sure they all get good playing time is important.
However, baseball 'shifts' are different from hockey shifts.
Hockey shifts every 45-60 seconds. If a player plays every third shift, you see that player playing every minute and a half (2 shifts * 45 seconds)
Baseball innings can be 15-20 minutes, and if a player only plays half the game (not unusual),
then it could be an hour (3 innings * 20 minutes) before you see that player play.
Next time Mrs. Murphy (fictitious name to protect the innocent) calls to discuss that her player
had to sit on the powerplay, 4 minutes into the first period, only to be out on the ice 90 seconds later max,
I'll have to remember to ask her about baseball/softball rotations, and how she interacts with that coach.
In hockey, the pace of the game requires that the players shift quickly, and it's important to keep them all in there
and moving thru the game. There's no benefit to sitting players on the bench unless there is a situation. (ie on-ice man up/man down, hurt player, coach/player discussion.). Watch a baseball game and see how that is so much different player rotation is!!!!
C. Intelligence.
Both sports require players to think. Seems that baseball has somewhat set plays: "hit and run", "squeeze play".
Seems that hockey has much more reactive intelligence, not pre-determined. Makes me think we can do a better
job teaching players about situations, what to look for, and how we can pre-determine the outcome/play.
I've pretty much settled on the idea that while coaching hockey, there's three different segments we need to look at:
Physical, Emotional and Intellectual.
Physical contains all the fundamentals (skating, passing, shooting). Much of the on-ice elements.
Emotional is the development of the drive within the player and using that. That's hard in developing players, but that may be the biggest differentiator in the long term.
Intellectual is the knowledge (rules, tendancies, etc.) and using your mind to create an advantage.
There's likely more to talk about there!
Coach